Video of Clintons’ depositions in House Epstein probe is released
Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks to the press after testifying in a closed-door deposition with the House Oversight Committee at the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center on February 26, 2026 in Chappaqua, New York. (Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
(WASHINGTON) — Videos of the closed-door depositions of ex-President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton regarding the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were released on Monday by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The Republican-led committee questioned each of the Clintons individually last week in their hometown of Chappaqua, New York, as part of an inquiry into the federal government’s handling of investigations into Epstein and his convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.
The deposition of Bill Clinton on Friday marked the first time a former president was compelled to testify before a congressional committee.
After being sworn in for his appearance, the former president acknowledged that the Oversight Committee’s desire to question him was justified while also distancing himself from Epstein.
“Through my brief acquaintance with Jeffrey Epstein, though it ended years before his crimes came to light, and though I never witnessed during our limited interactions any indication of what was going on, I’m here to offer what little I know so I can do my part to prevent something like this from happening again,” Bill Clinton said.
“I think you should have called me. I did take those plane trips with him and you have a right to ask those questions,” he added.
He also criticized the Oversight Committee for subpoenaing and questioning Hillary Clinton, arguing she had nothing to do with Epstein.
“I have to just say one personal thing. Since Hillary came in yesterday, she had nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. Nothing,” he said.
During her opening statement Thursday, Hillary Clinton argued that the committee was attempting to protect “one political party and one public official rather than to seek truth and justice for the victims.”
“You have made little effort to call the people who show up most prominently in the Epstein files. And when you did, not a single Republican member showed up for Les Wexner’s deposition,” she said of the former Epstein associate. “This institutional failure is designed to protect one political party and one public official rather than to seek truth and justice for the victims and survivors as well as inform the public who want to get to the bottom of this matter. ”
President Donald Trump has denied any wrongdoing related to Epstein.
“I don’t know how many times I had to say I did not know Jeffrey Epstein. I never went to his island. I never went to his homes, I never went to his offices. So it’s on the record numerous times,” Hillary Clinton told reporters after her closed-door session with the committee concluded Thursday.
In prepared opening remarks Clinton denied any knowledge of the crimes committed by Epstein, going on to say making his wife Hillary Clinton testify “was simply not right.”
In his statement as released, he stated that he would often say, “I do not recall” throughout his questioning because the events were “all a long time ago.”
“I saw nothing, and I did nothing wrong,” Clinton said, according to the statement.
Neither Bill Clinton nor Hillary Clinton has been accused of wrongdoing and both deny having any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes.
No Epstein survivor or associate has ever made a public allegation of wrongdoing or inappropriate behavior by the former president or his wife in connection with his prior relationship with Epstein.
Bill Clinton said in his opening statement that he had “no idea of the crimes Epstein was committing.”
Bill Clinton’s association with Epstein was first noted publicly in 2002 after reporters learned of the former president’s flight that year on Epstein’s jet for a humanitarian mission to multiple African nations.
In his statement as released, he stated that he would often say, “I do not recall” throughout his questioning because the events were “all a long time ago.”
“I saw nothing, and I did nothing wrong,” Clinton said, according to the statement.
Neither Bill Clinton nor Hillary Clinton has been accused of wrongdoing and both deny having any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes.
No Epstein survivor or associate has ever made a public allegation of wrongdoing or inappropriate behavior by the former president or his wife in connection with his prior relationship with Epstein.
Bill Clinton said in his opening statement that he had “no idea of the crimes Epstein was committing.”
Bill Clinton’s association with Epstein was first noted publicly in 2002 after reporters learned of the former president’s flight that year on Epstein’s jet for a humanitarian mission to multiple African nations.
None of the flight records from Epstein’s planes that have surfaced in litigation indicate that Clinton was ever aboard for a trip to Epstein’s island.
The Clintons were subpoenaed to appear under oath in front of the committee for a deposition in January, but failed to comply, arguing the subpoenas were without legal merit. Rather, they proposed a four-hour transcribed interview instead.
Following the Clintons’ refusal to appear, the Oversight Committee passed the contempt resolution with nine Democrats voting in favor of it, teeing it up for a full House vote.
At the last minute, just before the resolution was to be voted on in the House, the Clintons agreed to sit for a deposition, postponing further consideration of a contempt vote.
Signage outside the US Department of Justice (DOJ) headquarters in Washington, DC, US, on Friday, Feb. 17, 2023. (Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
(WASHINGTON) — The Justice Department is proposing a new policy that would seek to limit the ability of state bar associations to launch ethics probes into DOJ attorneys, according to a new document posted Wednesday in the Federal Register.
The proposal, which comes amid growing scrutiny of the department’s attorneys and whether they’re complying with ethical obligations in enforcing the Trump administration’s agenda, would seek to empower Attorney General Pam Bondi to request that state bar investigations be suspended pending a DOJ review of any originating complaint.
In the event the state bar authorities “refuse” to suspend their investigations, the proposal says, the Justice Department “shall take appropriate action to prevent the bar disciplinary authorities from interfering.”
It’s not immediately clear what “appropriate action” the department could take to influence state-level proceedings, and the proposed rule does not elaborate further.
The proposal argues that the bar complaint and investigation process has been “weaponized” by political activists in recent years to ensnare officials across DOJ’s ranks into costly and time-consuming proceedings.
“This unprecedented weaponization of the State bar complaint process risks chilling the zealous advocacy by Department attorneys on behalf of the United States, its agencies, and its officers,” the proposed rule said. “That chilling effect, in turn, would interfere with the broad statutory authority of the Attorney General to manage and supervise Department attorneys.”
A Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment from ABC News.
(NEW YORK) — Murat Mayor has no need for an associate’s degree. The 58-year-old business analyst already has a Ph.D. But when he and his son, a high school senior, attempted last fall to apply for federal student financial aid, they learned that an account associated with both of their identities already existed.
Those accounts showed applications to multiple community colleges — and much more.
“We noticed that there [was] a lot of activity” on accounts created in their names, Mayor said in an interview with ABC News. “There are a lot of applications, loan applications, grant applications … then we panicked.”
Mayor knew immediately that something was amiss. He assumed his identity had been stolen. But he had no concept of the breadth of the scheme that had ensnared his and his son’s identity, and he had certainly never heard of the army of digital fraudsters perpetrating the crime.
‘A huge issue’ They are known as “ghost students,” and for thousands of colleges across the country, these sophisticated thieves have a become a scourge. The scammers will use stolen or fake identities to enroll in classes online and sign up for Pell grants and loans, then disappear once they get the money — robbing the federal government of hundreds of millions of dollars and leaving an untold number of victims like Mayor and his son in their wake.
“It’s a huge issue,” said Jason Williams, the assistant inspector general for investigations at the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General. “As they’re stealing identities … these loans are not being repaid. They’re being assigned to people [who] don’t even know they have a debt with U.S. Department of Education … [until] the Internal Revenue Service says you owe the Department of Education money.”
Fraudsters have attempted to steal student financial aid for decades, Williams said. But “when the pandemic [hit], everybody went to online learning. Well, by doing that, it really did open the door” for more widespread fraud, said Williams.
Scammers have realized that the move to remote learning at community colleges provides an opportunity to leverage the power of artificial intelligence to expand their reach and circumvent identity verification controls. Almost overnight, experts said, the fraud grew exponentially.
Over the past five years, the federal government has investigated more than $350 million in fraud perpetrated by “ghost student” schemes, Williams said. “And that’s only in the universe of what we know, and what we have adjudicated,” he added. “There’s a lot of stuff that we don’t know that’s out there.”
Williams said his office has more than 200 investigations open nationwide, with some schemes suspected of racking up more than a billion dollars in ill-gotten gains.
Open season on open enrollment The federal government is on the hook for tuition aid lost to scammers. But it is the community colleges, which accept almost all applicants through open enrollment, that often carry the burden of sniffing out fake applications. And doing so requires the resources, technology and expertise that many institutions do not possess.
Experts say the scope of the fraud is enormous. In California alone, nearly a third of all community college applicants in 2024 were identified as fraudulent, according to the California Community Colleges, the state’s administrative body for the community college system.
Similar figures exist across the country. ABC News and its nationwide network of owned and operated stations investigated the rise of “ghost students” and found that almost no community college has been spared.
Gina Macklin, a senior administrator at Delaware County Community College, told WPVI-TV in Philadelphia that the school found more than 500 fake students enrolled in its classes in 2023, which she described as “a terrible year” for the school, not least of which because those fraudsters “had taken seats from legitimate students.”
Dr. Beatriz Chaidez, the chancellor of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District, told KGO-TV in San Francisco that at one point, a 50-person online class was booked in minutes and had 100 individuals on its waitlist. The school later learned that just six of those “students” were real people trying to get an education.
“The rest were fraudulent accounts,” she said. “Ghost students.”
Software solutions The Trump administration last year implemented enhanced fraud controls and identity verification requirements for schools, which experts say helped schools combat fake applicants. But to help root out the fraud, many community colleges have turned to a growing marketplace of identity verification software vendors.
Maurice Simpkins, a retired NFL linebacker, operates one such business. His software is called Student Application Fraudulent Examination, or S.A.F.E.
The platform acts as a firewall for the schools, Simpkins said. “From a football term,” he likes to say, “it’s an offensive line.” He says it catches around 95% of fake applications instantaneously and refers more to the school for additional scrutiny. After just two years on the market, S.A.F.E. is in use in more than 150 schools nationwide, he said.
Administrators at more than a dozen community colleges characterized the rise of “ghost students” as a true crisis. The fraudsters, those administrators say, are taking advantage of a vulnerability created by the degree to which these schools are accessible to students.
Officials say the scammers’ schemes range from the savvy to the sloppy — and all are brazen. One school administrator at a midwestern community college who asked not to be identified shared a “business proposal” he said he received last year from an alleged scammer.
In an email, the alleged scammer, who identified themselves as “Ken from Tanzania,” offered to pay the administrator a share of the proceeds for his help in perpetrating the fraud. “I would really like us to partner and work for 3semesters [sic] and we get something good for us and our families.”
Scammers who operate from overseas present a special challenge, according to investigators. But many of the “ghost students” operate within U.S. borders.
Before their arrests in 2018 and 2019, a father and son in Arizona made off with more than $7 million from ghost student scams, and both served 12-month prison sentences after pleading guilty. And a Maryland man who used the identities of 60 people to take in more than $6.7 million in fraudulent financial aid was sentenced in 2023 to four years in prison.
Murat Mayor, the 58-year-old business analyst, believes he and his son had their identities stolen as part of a massive hack of their health care provider in 2024. After months of back-and-forth with law enforcement and administrators at community colleges in Maryland and Utah, he finally cleared himself and his son from enrollment records earlier this month.
“He’s a straight-A student, has been very successful — an honor student, so he’s doing well,” Mayor told ABC News regarding his son.
Mayor’s son has applied to study business finance in the fall. And this time, it will really be him.
A display showing images of Alon, Oren, and Tal Alexander prior to a news conference in New York, Dec. 11, 2024. (Yuki Iwamura/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
(NEW YORK) — Their brand was ultra-lux real estate, and the lifestyle to match.
For more than a decade, brothers Oren and Tal Alexander built a rep of jetsetting glamour and partying at hot spots, flanked always by beautiful women.
What was actually going on behind the scenes, according to federal authorities, was criminal.
Along with a third brother, Alon, Oren and Tal Alexander were arrested in December 2024 on federal sex trafficking charges in a case that has splashed across the nation’s tabloids.
As the brothers prepare to go on trial, the case looms as a battle of he said, she said: whether, as their advocates say, their alleged behavior was simply boys partying hard — or, as authorities allege, something far more sinister.
In a 16-page indictment, the US Attorney’s Office in Manhattan says that for well over a decade, the Alexander brothers conspired to “repeatedly and violently drug, sexually assault and rape dozens of women,” using the “promise of luxury experiences, travel and accommodations” as a tool “to lure and entice” and ultimately force sex.
Prosecutors have assembled a chorus of women accusers whose accounts they hope will take a jury through a journey of rendezvous, drugs and booze in places like the Hamptons, Aspen, Las Vegas and the Bahamas.
Some of the accusations date to a time before the #MeToo reckoning. The brothers could face 15 years to life in prison, if convicted on all the federal charges. Oren and Alon also face state charges in Florida. And collectively, the three are staring at dozens of civil lawsuits that remain on hold while the criminal cases proceed.
The brothers’ parents, Orly and Shlomy Alexander, maintain their sons are innocent and insist that that will become clear from the testimony in the criminal case.
“We have been living with this ordeal since allegations first surfaced in civil lawsuits and were widely amplified long before any criminal charges were brought. The impact on our family has been profound and deeply painful,” the parents said in a statement to ABC News. “We believe our sons are innocent, and that if they are judged on the evidence presented at trial — free from speculation or public narrative — the truth will prevail. We ask only for a fair process, grounded in facts, where their voices can finally be heard.”
The sons of Israeli immigrants, Oren, 38, and Tal, 39, forged reputations as star brokers in the cutthroat world of New York luxury real estate, with a portfolio that includes some of the all-time most expensive home sales in the United States. As Oren and Tal in 2022 started their own brokerage, Oren’s twin Alon took a job as president of the family’s security firm.
Promiscuous and privileged though they may have been, the Alexander brothers’ lawyers argue they are not guilty of sexual violence. The men leveraged their success and used it to attract women, who, their lawyers insist, participated willingly. Defense attorneys insist the brothers’ did not commit the crimes they’re charged with and that their accusers’ accounts are dubious and “speculative,” motivated by hopes for windfalls.
“The Alexanders were interested in meeting women, and they met women in virtually any place a man could meet a woman: nightclubs, bars, restaurants, beach parties, pool parties, their own homes, the homes of friends, etc.,” their defense said in a November brief filed with the court.
“None of these women were drugged or raped or anything of the sort,” the defense submitted to US District Judge Valerie Caproni, overseeing the case. “Rather, those who engaged in sex with one or more of the Alexander brothers did so consensually. Years later, they either regretted their voluntary decision or, through communicating with other supposed victims, rewrote history or developed a perspective that was different from reality.”
The brothers’ spokesman, Juda Engelmayer, was more pointed: “Many of these began as late-filed civil claims, not criminal cases, and they surfaced without the objective evidence serious allegations would traditionally produce, no contemporaneous reports, medical documentation, or forensic findings,” he said, noting that the alleged victims did not come forward at the time of the alleged assaults. “At the time, the Alexander brothers were young and navigating adult social environments, but that is not criminal conduct and bears no resemblance to trafficking. These accusations exist only within litigation, where financial recovery is the incentive, not proof.”
Ensemble allegations In their filings, federal prosecutors alleged that the brothers employed a “pattern of behavior” of physical force and “drugged sexual assaults that were the hallmark of the defendants’ conspiracy.”
Prosecutors also point to a series of text message chats between the brothers and their friends about obtaining drugs, including Quaaludes, MDMA, cocaine, GHB and Ambien. The chemicals, federal authorities allege, were “to incapacitate women to further their sex trafficking scheme.”
The Alexanders’ defense challenged the prosecutors’ evidence, including chalking up those conversations as “idle chatter.”
“Even taking the Government’s factual allegations as true (which we do only for the purposes of this motion), there is not a single alleged instance of sex in exchange for something of value,” the defense said in a November filing. “In fact, the statements of the witnesses are precisely the opposite, specifically that they had sex against their will, either because they were drugged, drunk or forced.”
Prosecutors remain confident their case against the brothers is rock solid.
They have notified the court they plan to call seven alleged victims to prove the core of their charges, among them a woman who says she was only 16 years old when the sexual encounter occurred with Alon and Tal, who were 22 and 21 at the time.
Also expected to testify are other alleged victims, some of whom have filed civil lawsuits claiming assault by at least one of the brothers, and may also appear as witnesses in the state criminal case. Though their alleged assaults are not the subject of federal charges, the women may be called as witnesses to what prosecutors say illustrates a history of prior bad acts.
The federal judge has allowed one of the alleged victims in the Florida case to appear as a witness in New York. That woman, known in court papers as “M.G.,” says that in October 2021, she met Oren at a dinner, joined him and others on his boat, and a small group eventually went with him to his Miami home.
M.G. said her conversation with Oren was “flirty,” he gave her a drink, and it turned physical, according to her 2024 interview with a Miami Beach police detective. She alleged that it turned to unwanted and aggressive behavior, and he allegedly ripped her dress off.
When she ran downstairs and tried to open the backyard door, she said it “would not open,” and when she requested to be let out, she later told the detective, he sexually assaulted her with his fingers as she kept saying “no.” M.G. said when she could finally leave, she immediately told her friend what had happened, but that her friend “was pretty drunk.”
In her 2024 police interview, M.G.’s friend said she recalled being told Oren had “tried having sex with [M.G.] after she said no” but didn’t remember being told that Oren had penetrated M.G. in any way. The friend also did not recall the doors being locked when she texted M.G. and they decided to leave.
“I was like, ‘hey, where are you?’ And she said, ‘I think I’m in a room with Oren or something like that.’ And I was like, ‘I’m ready to leave. Let’s — let’s leave.’ And she’s like, ‘yes, please, let’s go.’ And then I just remember walking out of the house,” the friend said. She recalled M.G. seemed “distressed” and had told her “she didn’t want to sleep with him, and he was forcing it.”
In an October 2025 deposition with the Alexanders’ Florida attorneys, the friend reiterated Oren’s alleged advances and M.G.’s objections. But she also said there was nothing unusual about M.G.’s clothing when they left through the front door.
The Alexanders’ attorneys point to what they say are the women’s misaligned memories of the night as evidence the allegations cannot be proven in court.
“M.G’s story is like a C-grade Horror film,” Oren’s Florida defense attorneys Ed O’Donnell IV and Joel Denaro said in a statement to ABC News, adding “her best friend contradicts” several points of the alleged narrative.
“M.G.” did not respond to a request for comment from ABC News.
Other alleged victims in the federal case have offered similar stories of their own alleged assaults, according to court documents.
Two of the alleged victims in the federal case said in June 2009, they were “invited by party promoters to the Hamptons to celebrate Alon and Oren’s birthday.” Though taken to the club on a party bus, the women learned it would not return them to Manhattan.
Alon “told [one of the women] that he had a nice house” where “there would be a fun afterparty, and invited [her] to stay there,” according to court documents. Both women agreed to go to the house. The night allegedly became a blur of what they said were drugged and repeated group rapes by the brothers, though they said they could only be remembered in “flashes of memory” between the two.
Clash of the narratives A critical linchpin in each of the Alexanders’ cases will be the credibility of victims’ narratives, according to legal experts — a hallmark of sex-crimes cases.
“The prosecution of this type of case often comes with a unique set of challenges. As we saw during the prosecution of Sean Combs, consent can be a very complex issue,” said Matt Murphy, a former senior prosecutor in Orange County, Calif., referring to the recent case of hip-hop mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs.
“Jurors often struggle with things like continued contact, friendly text messages, alcohol use, and of course, pending civil suits,” said Murphy, now an ABC News legal contributor. “Prosecutorial success will depend heavily on victim credibility and solid corroboration. We’ll see.”
Some of the women who have come forward with their allegations have said they did so only after learning of others who said they had similar experiences with the brothers.
“Like, handfuls of girls … it was like everyone in Miami knew,” one of the alleged victims in the Florida case, identified in court papers as S.M., told a detective in August 2024, as seen in body-worn camera footage of the interview obtained by ABC News.
“Now I finally feel like, no one’s going to call me a liar ’cause I’m not the only one,” she told the detective.
S.M., who was a model at the time, said she went to an event where the group included Oren in October 2017. Afterward, she said she went with him to his apartment. Once there, she said, he gave her a glass of wine and a virtual reality headset to try, then led her to a bedroom, pushing her onto the bed, where she says he assaulted her as she told him, “no.”
The brothers’ attorneys have stressed that the real-time behavior from some of the alleged victims belies the narrative they have told prosecutors and the public.
The day after that alleged assault, S.M. posted a picture of herself in a bikini on social media with the caption, “Cloudy with a chance of awesome,” according to court filings. That night, the defense said, she went out with friends to a nightclub.
“I always am in a bikini and take pictures in bikinis because I’m a model,” S.M. explained to the defense during a September 2025 deposition in Florida, according to a transcript obtained by ABC News.
Days after her alleged assault, S.M. texted Oren a picture of them, together and smiling, taken at the event, according to court documents.
“You would acknowledge that by you sending him that picture three days later, it would indicate that you in no way thought that he sexually assaulted you back then,” the Alexanders’ Florida defense attorney Edward O’Donnell said during the deposition.
“I feel like I was in some sort of denial,” S.M. said. “I was hoping that it didn’t happen.”
Two weeks after her alleged assault, S.M. met up with Oren again. “I wanted him to make it right because I was — I didn’t want it to be true and I was hurting inside,” S.M. said during her deposition.
Their texts after the alleged assault tell a different story, O’Donnell argued.
“It would be nice to have dinner. Hopefully we can schedule something before you leave,” S.M. texted Oren on Nov. 2, 2017, according to court documents.
“Documented-wise, your actions, your photographs, your downloads, your videoing him, taking photographs of him, you sending him those pictures, all subsequent to you, the date you claim that you were sexually assaulted, all go against that your sex was non-consensual,” O’Donnell said.
S.M. insisted she did not consent to that encounter.
“I don’t have evidence of what happened in that room, but I know what happened in that room and how I chose to act afterwards,” S.M. responded during the deposition. “Whether it be naive or hopeful, doesn’t change that.”
S.M.’s attorney declined to comment to ABC News.
On Jan. 8, a grand jury returned one of several superseding indictments, adding an additional charge against Alon and Oren for allegedly drugging and assaulting a woman during a 2012 Bahamian cruise.
The two brothers had already been charged for allegedly slipping her a drugged drink and taking “turns raping” her; the additional count also charged them with allegedly engaging in sex with her “while she was physically incapable of declining participation.”
In a filing over the weekend, the Alexanders’ attorneys filed a motion to dismiss, arguing, among other things, that prosecutors have repeatedly made last-minute changes to the charges that have left insufficient time for the defense to fully investigate.
In particular, the defense cast doubt on the authenticity of a foreign birth certificate which would establish the alleged age of one of the females involved in some of the activity charged. Prosecutors allege that in 2009, Oren “recorded himself and another person engaging in sexual activity with a incapacitated 17-year-old girl in Manhattan.”
In their latest filing, the defense argued verifying such a birth certificate from a city “in an active war” is near-impossible, and more time is needed given the “central importance of the true birth date.” The judge has not yet weighed in.
The judge has scheduled jury selection to begin on Tuesday. The trial, which is scheduled to start on Jan. 26, is expected to last roughly a month.